The Big Fight in Minnesota

Courtesy:  Musical America Archives – Musical America.com

Musical America May 1978 Minnesota Youth Symphony Article Page 1Musical America May 1978 Minnesota Youth Symphony Article Page 2

 

Musical America May 1978 magazine coverOn Education – by Charles B. Fowler

Reprinted from High Fidelity/Musical America (December 1977).

You’ve heard that music teachers sometimes squabble?  Well, few scraps match the intensity of the recent battle in Minnesota between the Minnesota Youth Symphony and the Minnesota Music Educators Association, a state affiliate of the Music Educators National Conference.

It seems that members of MMEA, who were also founders, board members and conductors of the Greater Twin Cities Youth Symphony, were determined that that orchestra be the one and only non-school youth symphony in the area.  They used their influence within MMEA to pass resolutions in 1973 and 1975 “Concerning Extra-Curricular Musical Organizations and Their Relationship with School Instrumental Programs” and to send letters and telegrams on behalf of MMEA charging the Minnesota Youth Symphony and its former music director, Ralph Winkler, with certain unethical and unprofessional behavior and a deliberate failure to cooperate with MMEA and public school music directors.

To counter these charges the Minnesota Youth Symphony filed a complaint with the Federal District Court in Minneapolis against MMEA and seventeen of its past and present officers, directors, and ex-officio officers, naming certain individuals as co-conspirators.  The Minnesota Civil Liberties Union agreed to take the case for the Youth Symphony because they felt there were definite violations of students’ constitutional rights involving the first and fourteenth amendments.  In September 1977 Federal Judge Earl Larson ruled in favor of the Youth Symphony.

Some very important constitutional questions were raised in this case, mainly in regard to how much control the public school music educator can legally impose on students’ music activities outside of school.  The control attempted by the MMEA was ruled illegal and it might well be that the results of the case will have national impact and repercussions, since other states are involved in similar practices.

Just what does the Final Judgment accomplish?

It stipulates that the MMEA cannot control the outside musical activities of students by requiring that they belong to their school orchestras as a prerequisite to joining a private youth symphony, or require authorization signatures from their school music director and/or principal.  This may be the most far-reaching result of this case, because it strikes down the Code of Ethics of the American String Teachers Association.  The most that MMEA can do is to “strongly recommend” participation in school instrumental groups.

The judgment orders MMEA to cease all discriminatory acts in the public schools against the Minnesota Youth Symphony, its student members and/or conductors.  Legally this judgment protects students from being harassed and/or threatened in the public schools because they happen to participate in a non-school musical organization not to the liking of the music educator.  This protects all students participating in any outside-of-school musical activity, including such groups as drum and bugle corps, church choirs, rock bands, etc.  If the defendants and others served with the judgment violate its provisions, they can be declared in contempt of court and punished accordingly.

The judgment orders the MMEA to rescind the resolutions it passed that condemned the Minnesota Youth Symphony and instructed music educators to deny the symphony use of public school facilities and equipment and to actively discourage students from joining the symphony.  It orders MMEA to publish an apology in its official publication as well as a copy of the final judgment.

The final judgment even specifies that the apology and final judgment shall be printed on green paper “in the same manner as the notice form used for the 1975 resolution.”  It orders MMEA to advise its members of the revocation of the resolutions “in a bold-faced box as in the 1975 resolution.”  It also asks MMEA and the Minnesota Youth Symphony to agree to make reasonable efforts to avoid conflicting concert dates.  And it asks that a copy of the final judgment be served by the defendants upon the Music Educators National Conference, the American Symphony Orchestra League, the American String Teachers Association, and the National School Orchestra Association.

The case documents the unethical tactics of overzealous music teaches, who acted to obliterate a competing musical organization by discriminatory procedures and slander.  It shows how the political power of a professional organization can be manipulated and corrupted for self-serving purposes.

Who are the losers?  Such infighting is damaging to the music teaching profession and to the arts in general.  By their lack of magnanimity these music teachers debased their own kind.  But who loses the most?  The students.  Such tension and strife distract the learner and detract from the learning situation.  Energies are misdirected.  It’s a bad lesson in human relations.

But the case says something else that his even more disturbing:  music is by no means an assured route to humanism.  Generosity, love, esteem, honesty, appropriateness, forthrightness, integrity – these are traits as much apart from the arts as the sciences.  At times the arts may reflect them, but the human being – even those in the closest association with music – may simply choose to look the other way.

 

 

Youth Symphony Wins Civil Rights Case

Symphony News December 1977 coverReprinted from Symphony News, Vol. 28, No. 6 (May 1978).

Independent youth orchestras in conflict with public school music departments won an important, far-reaching decision in a case involving the Minnesota Youth Symphony and the Minnesota Music Educators Association.

A judgment handed down on September 22, 1977, held that the MMEA cannot require students to belong to their respective public school organizations but can only strongly recommend that a student who is involved in a non-school youth orchestra also be a member of his or her school music program.  The ruling, by Federal Judge Earl Larson, prohibited any intimidation or discrimination by the MMEA or its members toward the members or prospective members and conductors of the Minnesota Youth Symphony.

Symphony News Minnesota Youth Symphony December 1977The lawsuit was filed in June 1975 by MYS on behalf of itself and its members against the MMEA for reasons of discrimination.  The Minnesota Civil Liberties Union argued the case for the MYS because it felt there were violations of students’ rights as stated in the first and fourteenth amendments [of the U.S. Constitution].

As a result of the ruling, the MMEA was ordered to rescind resolutions concerning the relationship between extracurricular and school music programs and to apologize to the MYS, its members and conductors for charges it made concerning unethical and unprofessional behavior.  As a precedent, the Minnesota ruling appears to strike down the ASTA Code of Ethics.

Under the final judgment, conditions are set for the relationship of the MMEA and the MYS.  Reasonable efforts are to be made to avoid conflicting concert dates.  Should a conflict arise, “school music directors cannot discriminate in awarding grades, or deny the students the right to earn credits in a regularly offered school music course if the student should decide to play in a non-school concert which conflicts with a school concert scheduled outside normal school hours.”

Final Judgment in the case of Minnesota Youth Symphony vs. Minnesota Music Educators Association (September 22, 1977)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

FOURTH DIVISION

Civ. 4-74-121

FINAL JUDGMENT

Minnesota Youth Symphony, a Minnesota corporation,

on behalf of itself and its members and

Diana Kodner, a minor, by her father and natural guardian, Howard Kodner; Stephanie Mrozla, a minor, by her father and natural guardian, Marc A. Mrozla; Heather Scott, a minor, by her father and natural guardian, Edward I. Scott; John Wasson, a minor, by his mother and natural guardian, Luella L. Wasson; Janeen Keller, a minor, by her father and natural guardian, Donald Keller; Kim Loos, a minor, by his father and natural guardian, Davis Loos; and Marjorie Meier, a minor, by her mother and natural guardian, Rosemary Meier,

Plaintiffs,

v.

Minnesota Music Educators Association,

Oscar B. Dahle, Donald Gjerdrum, Linville Doan, Richard Papke, Richard Aune, Charles Olson, Carol Palmquist, Mark Lammers, James R. Gronseth, James Colosimo, Stan Kindzerski, Walt Lindberg, Joe Fennie, Robert Hotvet, David Jordahl, Russell Pesola, Glenn Evensen, Robert Iverson, Fred Arnold, Gloria Kiester, David Price

Defendants.

Plaintiffs having filed their amended complaint on June 27, 1975, and the parties hereto having consented to the entry of this judgment without trial or adjudication of any issue of fact or law,

            NOW, THEREFORE, prior to the taking of any testimony, before the adjudication of any issue of law or fact, and upon the consent of the parties hereto,

            IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUSGED AND DECREED AS FOLLOWS:

I.          Jurisdiction

This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action and personal jurisdiction over the defendants to the complaint.  The amended complaint states claims upon which relief may be granted under section 1983 of Title 42 of the United States Code.

II.        Definitions

As used in this Final Judgment:

A.        “To Discriminate” or “Discriminating” means the failure to treat Minnesota Youth Symphony (M.Y.S.) equally with all other “non-public school” musical organizations, and/or the failure to treat actual or prospective members of M.Y.S. equally with all other actual or prospective members of other non-public school musical organizations.

B.         “Prospective members of M.Y.S.” means any public school students which might be, in any manner, interested in, suitable for or eligible for participation in M.Y.S.

C.        “School facilities” means any instrumentality which is in any manner controlled by any public school in the State of Minnesota, including, without limitation, school bulletin boards, school music rooms, school auditoriums and school musical instruments.

III.       Applicability

The provisions of this Final Judgment shall apply to the defendants and to each of their officers, directors, agents, employees, successors and assigns, and to all other persons in active concert of participation with the defendants who shall have received actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise. 

IV.       Prohibited Acts

Defendants are hereby enjoined and restrained from:

A.        In any manner intimidating, threatening or coercing, or attempting to intimidate, threaten or coerce any actual or prospective member of M.Y.S. with the purpose of interfering with his or her full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, benefits, privileges and advantages of public school attendance on the ground of that person’s actual or prospective membership in M.Y.S.

B.         In any manner deterring, hindering or impeding, or attempting to deter, hinder or impede, students from joining M.Y.S. or from participating in M.Y.S. activities.

C.        Withholding, denying, or attempting to withhold or deny, or depriving, or attempting to deprive, any actual or prospective member of M.Y.S. of the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, benefits, privileges and advantages of public school attendance on the ground of that person’s actual or prospective membership in M.Y.S.

D.        In any manner discriminating, or attempting to discriminate, against actual or prospective members of M.Y.S. who are public school students by reason of said students’ actual or prospective membership in M.Y.S., including, without limitation:

(1)        Discriminating, or attempting to discriminate, in the use, right to use or opportunity to use school facilities;

(2)        Discriminating, or attempting to discriminate, in the awarding of grades; and

(3)        Discriminating, or attempting to discriminate, in the right to attend or otherwise participate in M.Y.S. concert or rehearsal sessions.

E.         In any manner discriminating, or attempting to discriminate, against M.Y.S., including, without limitation:

(1)        Discriminating, or attempting to discriminate, against M.Y.S. in the posting of audition and/or promotional materials on school bulletin boards controlled by the defendants; and

(2)        Discriminating, or attempting to discriminate, against M.Y.S. in the recruitment of members among public school students.

F.         In any matter intimidating, threatening or coercing, or attempting to intimidate, threaten or coerce, any person from becoming or continuing as a music director or conductor of M.Y.S.

G.        Engaging in any conspiracy or plan with the intent of hindering, impeding or precluding M.Y.S. from full participation in the Minnesota musical community on an equal basis with all other musical groups, including without limitation, engaging in such conspiracy or plan with respect to M.Y.S. fundraising activities.

V.        MMEA Resolutions – Other Writings

MMEA is hereby ordered and directed to forthwith rescind the 1967, 1973 and 1975 resolutions passed by said organization concerning extracurricular musical organizations and their relationship with school instrumental programs.  To ameliorate any harm to the reputations of M.Y.S. and its former music director, Ralph Winkler, which may have resulted from the passage of the 1973 and 1975 resolutions, and accusations made against M.Y.S. and Ralph Winkler in letters and telegrams sent on behalf of the Minnesota Music Educators Association to persons in Minnesota and elsewhere, MMEA shall prominently publish in the October, 1977 issue of Gopher Music Notes, the official publication of the Minnesota Music Educators Association, separate and apart from the publication of this entire final judgment, using as a format the manner of publication of the aforementioned 1975 resolution, the following:

“In the 1973 and 1975 Resolutions of MMEA titles ‘Concerning Extra-Curricular Musical Organizations and Their Relationship with School Instrumental Programs’ and in certain letters and telegrams written on behalf of MMEA, M.Y.S. and its former music director, Ralph Winkler, were charged with certain unethical and unprofessional behavior and a deliberate failure to cooperate with MMEA and public school music directors.

Pre-trial discovery conducted by M.Y.S. and on file with the United States District Court for public review in the action brought by M.Y.S. against MMEA and certain individuals who are 17 of its past and present officers, directors and ex-officio officers and naming certain individuals as co-conspirators has revealed that these charges were false and unfounded.

MMEA hereby apologizes to M.Y.S., its members and conductors for making such charges.  It is suggested that readers place a copy of this notice on their school music bulletin boards.”

As used herein, the manner of publication of the 1975 resolution shall mean the following:  The preceding paragraph and this final judgment shall be printed on green paper with the preceding paragraph being printed on the first page under the caption “Notice M.M.E.A. Members” in the same manner as the notice form used for the 1975 resolution.  In addition, the first page shall advise members of MMEA of the revocation of the 1967, 1973 and 1975 resolutions.  The foregoing shall be placed in a bold-faced box as in the 1975 resolution.  Nothing more shall be contained on the first page.  The final judgment and stipulation of the parties shall be printed on green paper on the pages immediately following the above notice.  The foregoing shall be firmly affixed into the middle of the Gopher Music Notes.

VI.       Stipulation of Parties

The Court hereby adopts as part of this Final Judgment the following stipulations of the parties:

A.        MMEA School Participation Policy:  MMEA will adopt the following policy as to student participation in public school instrumental groups:

The MMEA realizes that its members cannot require students to belong to their respective public school instrumental groups.  MMEA, therefore, only strongly recommends that a student who belongs to a non-school youth orchestra is also a member of his/her public school instrumental group.  Neither the MMEA, nor any of its members, may legally require that a student be enrolled in any public school music organization as a prerequisite in any non-school music organization, such as the M.Y.S.  The MMEA further realizes that students cannot be required to secure authorization from their school music director and/or principal as a condition to participation in non-school music organizations.

B.         Apology of MMEA:  MMEA hereby acknowledges that certain of its members who were also founders and/or board members and conductors of a non-school youth symphony organization (Greater Twin Cities Youth Symphonies) specifically created to become the one and only non-school youth symphony resource in this area have engaged in questionable conduct in the past toward and concerning M.Y.S., its music director and conductors and certain of its members.  MMEA wishes to formally apologize to everyone in the Minnesota music community, including M.Y.S., for any harm which may have been caused by such conduct.

C.        Scheduling:  The defendants and M.Y.S. agree to make reasonable efforts to avoid conflicting concert dates.  It must be recognized that merely because one group schedules a concert date earlier than the other does not mean that the latter cannot schedule a conflicting date.  All that is intended here is that the parties make reasonable, good-faith efforts to avoid conflicts.

            MMEA also recognizes that school music directors cannot discriminate in awarding grades, or deny students the right to earn credits, in a regularly offered school music course if the student should decide to play in a non-school concert which conflicts with a school concert scheduled outside of normal school hours.  However, if an organization is completely extracurricular, in that it is not offered for credit and only meets out of normal school hours, attendance at activities outside of normal school hours can be required as a condition of continued membership in the organization.

VII.     Notice

Defendants are ordered and directed, within thirty (30) days of the date of entry of this Final Judgment, to personally serve a copy of this Final Judgment upon the following persons:  Richard Sieber; Stephen Sell; Lawrence Gibson; William Jones; Richard Negaard; James Chlebecek; George Chlebecek; James Peterson.

            Defendants are ordered and directed, within thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this Final Judgment, to serve a copy of this Final Judgment by registered mail upon the following persons:  Marvin Rabin; Thomas Jensen; James Hainlen.

            Defendants are ordered and directed, within thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this Final Judgment, to service by mail, in accordance with the Rules of Civil Procedure, a copy of this Final Judgment upon each K-through-12 public school music teacher and each college music instructor who is employed in public schools or colleges located in the counties of Hennepin, Ramsey, Anoka, Washington, Wright, Rice, Dakota, Scott, Goodhue, Carver, Olmstead, Stearns, Chisago, Wabasha, McLeod and Sherburne — as their names and addresses are set forth in the 1976-77 Directory of Minnesota Music Teachers as prepared by the MMEA — a copy of which directory will be sent to M.Y.S. upon request.

            A copy of this Final Judgment shall be served by defendants by mail upon the Music Educators National Conference, American Symphony Orchestra League, American String Teachers Association and National School Orchestra Association.

            An informational copy of this Final Judgment shall be served by defendants by mail upon the foundations and other concerns listed in Schedule A attached hereto.

            Within ten (10) days of the service required by the Final Judgment, defendant shall file with this Court an affidavit attesting to completion of service required by this Final Judgment.

            A copy of this Final Judgment shall be conspicuously published in the October 1977 issue of Gopher Music Notes using as a format the manner and publication of the aforementioned 1975 resolution.

VIII.    Retention of Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction is retained for the purpose of enabling any of the parties to this Final Judgment to apply to this Court at any time for such further orders and directions as may be necessary or appropriate for the construction, implementation and/or modification of this Final Judgment, for the enforcement of compliance herewith and for the punishment of any violation of any of the provisions contained herein.

Earl Larson Final Judgment September 22 1977

 

 

 

Minnesota Music Educators Association signed consent decree 1977Filed September 22, 1977 by Harry A. Sieben, Clerk

___________________

Note:

All legal material, subpoenaed documents and exhibits pertaining to this lawsuit, along with all written transcripts of deposition of the defendants taken under oath, are on file at the U.S. Federal Court House.  The above material under File No. Civ. 4-74-121 is open to the general public upon request for viewing at the Office of the Clerk of the:

U.S. District Court, Federal Building and U.S. Court House — Room 514, 110 South 4th Street, Minneapolis, MN  USACiv. 4-74-121 Final Judgment Minnesota Youth Symphony v. Minnesota Music Educators Association

 

 

Letter from the Minnesota Youth Symphony to parents and friends announcing the Final Judgment in the legal action against the Minnesota Music Educators Association

October 19, 1977

Dear Parents & Friends:

Please read carefully the attached copy of this Final Judgment which concludes the lawsuit brought by the Minnesota Youth Symphony (MYS) against the Minnesota Music Educators Association (MMEA).  This judgment was signed by Federal Judge Earl Larson on September 22, 1977 and was filed at the Federal Court House in Minneapolis on September 27, 1977. 

Some very important constitutional questions were raised in this case, mainly with regard to how much control the public school music educator can legally impose on students’ outside-of-school music activities.  The results of this case may well have national impact and repercussions, because this illegal control attempted here by the MMEA is not a local phenomenon; it exists in the other 49 states as well. 

The Minnesota Civil Liberties Union (MCLU) agreed to take the case for MYS because it felt there were definite violations of students’ first and fourteenth amendment constitutional rights involved.  We will be forever grateful to the MCLU, William Killion and Kristin Nelson, volunteer attorneys for the MCLU and members of the Gray, Plant, Mooty, Mooty and Bennett law firm, who successfully argued the case for MYS.

Just what does this Final Judgment accomplish?

  • It stipulates that the MMEA cannot control the outside musical activities of students by requiring that they belong to their school orchestras as a prerequisite to joining a private youth symphony, or require authorization signatures from their school music director and/or principal.  This is probably the most far-reaching result of this case, because it strikes down the American String Teachers Association (ASTA) Code of Ethics which is used nationwide.  The most that MMEA can do is to “strongly recommend” participation in school instrumental groups. If an attempt is made to enforce the provisions or the ASTA Code, it is an illegal act.  (See pages 6 and 7 under “School Participation Policy” and “Scheduling.”  These are very important stipulations.)
  • It imposes a permanent restraining order on the defendants (MMEA), along with all other persons who acted in concert with them (see co-conspirators listed on pages 7 and 8) and those who receive notice of this Final Judgment, and orders them to cease all discriminatory acts in the public schools against the MYS, its student members and/or MYS conductors.  They must grant equal treatment to MYS – the same as that granted to other non-school musical organizations such as the Greater Twin Cities Youth Symphonies (GTCYS).  (See list of prohibited acts detailed on pages 3 and 4.)
  • Legally, this judgment protects students from being harassed and/or threatened in the public schools because they happen to participate in a non-school musical organization not to the liking of the music educator.  This protects all students participating any outside-of-school musical activity, including such groups as drum & bugle corps, church choirs, rock bands, etc.  If the defendants and others served with this judgment violate its provisions, they can be declared in contempt of court and may be punished accordingly (see page 9).
  • It orders the MMEA to rescind the resolutions it passed which condemned the MYS and instructed music educators to deny MYS use of public school facilities and equipment, and to actively discourage students from joining MYS (see page 4).
  • MMEA admits that the MYS and [music director] Ralph Winkler had done nothing unethical or wrong, and that the MMEA charges against them were false and unfounded (see page 5).
  • MMEA acknowledges and apologizes for the questionable conduct of certain of its members who were also founders and/or board members and conductors of the Greater Twin Cities Youth Symphonies.  The GTCYS was specifically created by these persons to become the one and only non-school youth symphony resource in the area.  MYS was condemned by these people because it dared to exist and to remain independent (see page 6).

Once again, I urge you to read this Final Judgment very carefully and retain it for future reference.  The MYS Board of Directors, officers of the Parents Association, its Music Director and conductors stand ready to receive and to act on any reports of violations of the prohibited acts and stipulations included in this judgment.  Procedures have been established to communicate such violations to the U.S. District Court.

It has been a long, hard struggle for MYS, but justice has prevailed and the students’, conductors’ and MYS’s constitutional freedoms have been protected.  Our thanks go to the MCLU and the many lawyers who have donated so much time and talent to this case, and to all you student members, parents and friends who remained loyal throughout the long ordeal.

Sincerely yours,

Jane Nones, President, MYS Board of Directors